Contact Info
Why do Saudi consulting firms need ERP advice before choosing software?
Saudi consultancies often sell people as much as deliverables: PMO teams billed per person-month, transformation advisors on long programs and experts brought in from abroad. I document the commercial and delivery model behind that work, covering nationalization targets, withholding on payments to non-resident experts and Arabic deliverables, then support the selection and implementation of a platform that fits.
Last reviewed by Vikas Saroj
I work remotely with consultancies serving the Kingdom's transformation programs: strategy firms, PMO and delivery specialists, technology advisors and local firms working alongside international networks. Many engagements are resource based, with named consultants billed per month against a client-approved organization chart, alongside deliverable-based work for other clients.
That mix stresses ordinary systems. Staffing must respect nationalization targets, foreign experts need visas and mobilization, payments to non-resident associates raise withholding questions, and invoices only move once attendance and deliverables are confirmed. Before any software conversation starts, I map how the firm currently deals with every one of them.
I advise managing partners, delivery heads and CFOs of consulting firms in Saudi Arabia on the processes and systems behind resource-based and deliverable-based work.
I structure person-month contracts so each approved position, its grade, rate, start date and replacement history is recorded, and invoices are built from confirmed attendance rather than a spreadsheet.
Staffing requirements that show the nationality mix per engagement and per entity alongside skills and availability, so resourcing decisions consider workforce targets before they become a problem.
A process for paying overseas associates and affiliated firms that records any withholding your advisor confirms, supports the related filings and charges the full cost to each engagement.
Visa, flight, accommodation, transport and allowance costs coded to engagements, with the rebillable terms from each contract applied at the moment a claim is approved.
Milestones that mirror client review committees, so partners can see what has been delivered, accepted, invoiced and paid on each program without chasing project managers for updates.
Shortlisting, scripted demos on your own engagements and a review of implementer proposals, with no commercial tie to any platform influencing the recommendation you receive.
An ERP for consulting should make these numbers available without a spreadsheet. I design the data model and reports around them from the start.
How programs are sold and staffed
Requirements ready for vendors
Go-live on real programs
A large share of consulting work in Saudi Arabia is sold as capacity: a program management office, a transformation team or embedded specialists billed per person-month against positions the client has approved. The contract lists positions with grades and monthly rates, and the client expects each position filled by someone matching the approved profile. Invoices are typically supported by attendance or timesheet records and a summary of work, and an unfilled or late-filled position reduces the bill.
Spreadsheets cope with one program. They break when the firm runs several, each with its own position list, rates, replacement rules and approval routine. I model the contract as positions rather than just people: each position has a rate and a history of who filled it and when, and attendance is recorded against the position. Billing then follows directly from approved attendance, with deductions calculated rather than argued.
The same firms usually sell deliverable-based engagements too, so the design has to handle both without forcing one model onto the other. Program margin compares position revenue with the fully loaded cost of whoever filled it, which is where the business case for each program is won or lost. The general consulting model is described on my consulting ERP page, and law, audit and engineering firms are covered on the Saudi professional services page.
Saudi firms work under nationalization requirements that set expectations for the share of Saudi nationals in the workforce, with targets that vary by activity and company size. For a consultancy this is not only an HR statistic. It affects which candidates are hired, which consultants are staffed on visible engagements and whether a new foreign hire is possible at all. Some clients also ask about the nationality mix of the team serving them.
Most firms track this in the HR system and discover staffing consequences late. I bring the relevant attributes into the resourcing view: nationality category, grade, skills, language and current bookings, alongside the entity's position against its target as reported by HR. When a resource manager staffs a new program, they can see the effect on the mix and on bench before confirming.
I do not advise on how the rules apply to your firm; check current requirements with your HR and government relations advisors. The system's job is to keep accurate data on who works where, so management reporting is reliable and staffing decisions are made with the full picture. Development roles for Saudi graduates, which many consultancies run, can also be tracked as bookings so their time and cost are visible rather than buried in overhead.
Consultancies in the Kingdom often bring in expertise from outside it: specialists from an international network, associates who work remotely from abroad, or an affiliated firm that delivers part of a program. When a Saudi entity pays a non-resident for services, withholding tax may apply depending on the type of service, the relationship and any treaty relief, and the paying firm is responsible for deducting and filing it.
In practice the risk is administrative. An associate invoice is paid in full by accounts payable, the withholding is missed and the firm bears it later. I design the payables process so every supplier is classified as resident or non-resident, the treatment confirmed by your tax advisor is applied when the invoice is approved, and the withheld amount is posted to a liability that feeds the filing. The cost charged to the engagement should reflect the gross service cost, including any withholding the firm absorbs under the contract.
Many of these firms also deal with zakat or corporate income tax depending on ownership, and they issue e-invoices to Saudi clients. Those wider requirements are covered on my Saudi ERP consultant page. Here the point is narrower: cross-border expert costs must reach engagement margin accurately.
Putting a consultant in front of a Saudi client can involve a work or business visa, flights, accommodation, transport and a daily allowance, particularly for programs outside the main cities. Some contracts reimburse these costs, some include them in the monthly position rate and some pay a fixed mobilization fee. Unless the terms are recorded on the engagement, the firm absorbs costs it could have billed or bills costs the client never agreed to.
I specify an expense model where each claim is tied to an engagement and position, flagged as rebillable or absorbed under that contract's terms, and supported with receipts. Long assignments may use company-leased accommodation, which needs to be allocated across the consultants and programs using it rather than sitting in general overhead.
Deliverables add another layer. Reports, presentations and steering committee packs are often required in Arabic or in both languages, and translation and review take time and money. I treat translation as a tracked activity with its own time codes, so its cost is visible per engagement and future proposals price it properly.
Saudi consultancies hear from implementers of every major platform, and from practice tools built for other markets. The questions I test are specific: can the system bill person-month positions from approved attendance, record non-resident withholding, show nationality mix in staffing, produce Arabic and English documents and connect to a compliant e-invoicing solution for Saudi clients?
I write the requirements first, run scripted demos using your own programs and score the results. Then I review each implementation proposal, including the localization approach and post-go-live support. Once a vendor is chosen, I work beside the implementer, write test scripts and verify opening balances for active positions, unbilled attendance and withholding liabilities. The ERP vendor selection service page describes the selection stage in more detail.
My part is delivered remotely. Program managers, finance and partners take part in online mapping and review sessions planned around the Saudi working week, and every requirement is written down for sign-off rather than left in meeting notes. Face-to-face sessions at a critical decision can be arranged. The Saudi Arabia hub describes how I support businesses in the Kingdom more broadly.
Tell me about your business and current systems. I’ll suggest the most sensible first step.
Book a Consultation
Not sure which ERP you need?
Share your business requirements with me and I will help you understand the right process, architecture and platform before implementation.
Yes, when the contract is modeled as positions with rates and attendance is recorded against each position. The invoice then reflects approved attendance, including deductions for vacancies or late starts. I define the position model, the approval steps and the supporting report the client receives, then test it on a live program during UAT.
Classify each supplier as resident or non-resident, have your tax advisor confirm the treatment for each service type, and apply it when invoices are approved rather than when payments are made. The withheld amount should post to a liability that supports the filing. I design that process and the reports; the tax treatment itself comes from your advisor.
It can show the nationality category of each consultant and the mix on each engagement, and it can display the entity position as reported by HR. That helps resource managers see the effect of staffing decisions before they confirm them. The official calculation and compliance remain with your HR and government relations teams.
Yes. Discovery, process mapping, requirements, demos and UAT all run online with your partners, program managers and finance team, planned around your working week. Because your own consultants are spread across client locations, remote sessions are often easier to staff than a single workshop room. In-person time at a key decision can be discussed by arrangement.
Every business is different. Share where you are today and what you want to fix, and I’ll tell you honestly whether and how I can help.
Book a Consultation
Book a consultation to talk through your processes, systems and goals. I’ll reply with practical next steps - no obligation.