Contact Info
What does a trading ERP consultant do for US importers?
A trading ERP consultant helps US importers and trading companies design an ERP that carries duty and tariff cost into each item, matches customs broker charges to purchase orders, applies sales tax by ship-to state and tracks resale certificates. I map the import and sales cycle, test platforms against real containers and customers, and oversee implementation so margin per shipment is based on true landed cost.
Last reviewed by Vikas Saroj
I work remotely with US importers, master distributors and general trading companies that buy overseas, clear goods through a customs broker and resell to retailers, contractors or other businesses. Most started on QuickBooks or an older on-premise package, with containers tracked in spreadsheets and tariff charges spread across the books by hand.
The American version of the trading problem has two sides. On the buy side, duty and tariff charges can change faster than your price lists, so landed cost has to be worked out per shipment. On the sell side, sales tax depends on where goods are delivered and on whether the buyer has given you a valid resale or exemption certificate.
I map both sides before anyone demos software, then help you pick and implement a platform that handles them without a side spreadsheet.
Most US traders reach me when tariff changes, a second warehouse or a sales tax review exposes how much of the business runs outside the accounting system.
I define how duty, tariffs, broker fees, drayage and inland freight flow into item cost, and how a broker's entry summary is matched to the purchase order it relates to.
I document where you ship, which states you collect in, how exempt and resale customers are flagged, and whether tax is calculated natively or through a connected tax engine.
Commercial invoice, packing list, tariff classification per item and country of origin are captured once in the ERP, so your broker receives consistent data instead of re-keyed spreadsheets.
Net terms, credit limits, holds on overdue accounts and, where you use them, factoring or trade credit insurance requirements are written into the order-to-cash design from the start.
I score shortlisted ERPs against your own containers and customer mix, including a duty change mid-season and a sale to a tax-exempt resale customer in another state.
I work beside your chosen implementer to keep configuration on the agreed design, write UAT scripts around real trades and support cutover and the first close.
An ERP for trading should make these numbers available without a spreadsheet. I design the data model and reports around them from the start.
Trade lanes, tax and terms
Requirements and platform fit
Build, test and cut over
For a typical US importer, the flow I map runs like this: supplier quote, purchase order in dollars or the supplier's currency, deposit or letter of credit, booking with the forwarder, ocean or air shipment, entry filed by your customs broker, duty and fees paid, drayage to your warehouse or a third-party logistics provider, receipt, putaway, sale, shipment to the customer and collection on net terms.
Each handoff produces a document that should land in the ERP against the right purchase order: the bill of lading, the broker's entry summary and invoice, the freight bill, the delivery receipt. When those documents arrive by email and get keyed into accounting weeks later, cost of goods sold for that period is wrong and nobody can say by how much.
Some importers use bonded warehouses or foreign-trade zones to defer duty until goods leave. That adds a stock status the ERP has to respect, because inventory physically under your control may not yet carry its final duty cost. I note these variations in the process map early, because they change which platforms are realistic for you.
Tariff exposure is the part of US trading that most often breaks an existing costing method. When duty on a product category changes, the next container costs more or less than the last one, and selling prices set on an old average lag behind reality. A trading ERP needs to carry duty as its own cost element per item, not as a lump buried inside freight.
The decisions I get agreed with your controller or outside accountant before configuration include:
That last report matters when you are weighing alternative sourcing countries. Classification itself remains your broker's and advisor's responsibility; the ERP's job is to hold the code against each item and make the numbers visible. The costing mechanics are covered in more depth in my guide to ERP for trading companies.
US trading companies mostly sell business to business, so a large share of customers buy for resale and should not be charged sales tax, provided you hold a valid certificate for them. In practice I often find certificates stored in a shared drive, with no expiry tracking and no link to the customer record. If a state reviews your sales, that gap becomes your exposure.
The requirements I write cover how the taxing location is determined for each order, which your tax advisor should confirm; how exempt status is flagged per customer and per state; how certificates are stored, linked and renewed; and how online or direct-to-consumer orders are treated differently from trade orders. Where you have obligations in many states, a dedicated tax calculation service connected to the ERP is usually more reliable than maintaining rates by hand.
The tax position itself is your advisor's call. My part is a system able to apply it consistently, and that the evidence behind each exempt sale can be produced quickly. My ERP consulting work in the USA covers sales tax design for other industries as well.
The usual starting point is QuickBooks Online or Desktop with an inventory add-on, sometimes Sage, sometimes a warehouse tool bolted onto accounting. The move to ERP tends to follow a second warehouse or 3PL, a second entity, an e-commerce channel next to wholesale, or a lender asking for inventory reporting the current setup cannot produce with confidence.
For migration I focus on what keeps trading alive on cutover day: open purchase orders and their deposits, containers on the water with costs accrued so far, open receivables with their credit terms, customer exemption records, and opening stock at landed cost rather than supplier price. Years of finished shipments can sit in the old system as a read-only archive.
Integrations commonly needed are bank feeds, the 3PL or warehouse system, EDI with large retail customers if you sell to them, the sales tax service, and a shipment visibility feed from your forwarder. I plan each one with an owner and a direction of data flow through ERP integration planning and data migration work, so nothing is left for the week before go-live.
Many US implementers have a preferred platform and a template built for generic distributors. That template may be fine, but it rarely reflects tariff-driven cost swings, a customer base split between resellers and taxable end users, and a broker workflow you have refined over years of shipments. I write the requirements, test platforms against them and review the implementer's design, so the system follows your trade rather than the template.
Because I work remotely, I plan live workshops in the hours that overlap best with your head office, then share recorded walkthroughs of process maps and system designs so warehouse leads and outside accountants can review them on their own schedule. Buyers, warehouse staff and finance in different states can all contribute without everyone sitting in the same call.
If you are not yet sure you need a new ERP at all, start with a short diagnostic of the current process. Sometimes the right fix is a cleaner landed cost routine and proper certificate management in the system you already own. For wider context see the USA overview and the general trading ERP page; if you mainly sell in volume to trade accounts, wholesale ERP is also relevant.
Tell me about your business and current systems. I’ll suggest the most sensible first step.
Book a Consultation
Not sure which ERP you need?
Share your business requirements with me and I will help you understand the right process, architecture and platform before implementation.
Yes, if it is designed for it. Duty should be a separate cost element allocated to each item on the entry, not merged into freight. Most mid-market ERPs can do this through landed cost or item charge features. The harder part is agreeing the allocation method and how late broker invoices are handled, which I settle with your accountant before configuration.
If you collect tax in only a few states and sell mostly to resellers, built-in tax rates may be enough. Once you have obligations in many states, mixed taxable and exempt customers, or online sales, a connected tax calculation service is usually more dependable. I document your situation and test both options; your tax advisor confirms where you must collect.
Often, yes. Agreeing which charges belong in item cost, how they are allocated and who records them is a process decision that any system will need. Doing that first makes platform selection easier and sometimes shows that a better inventory add-on is enough for now. I help you decide which route makes sense.
I do not replace your broker or give classification advice. I talk with them to understand what data they need from you and what they send back, then design the ERP so item, origin and shipment data go out cleanly and entry summaries and invoices come back against the right purchase orders.
Through online workshops, shared process maps, structured requirement sessions and recorded walkthroughs. Live sessions are booked in the part of the day your head office shares with me, with asynchronous reviews for teams in other time zones. Documents and decisions are kept in one shared place so nobody depends on meeting notes.
Every business is different. Share where you are today and what you want to fix, and I’ll tell you honestly whether and how I can help.
Book a Consultation
Book a consultation to talk through your processes, systems and goals. I’ll reply with practical next steps - no obligation.