Contact Info
What can an ERP consultant do for an Australian engineering business?
I help Australian engineering firms that design and build to order, often for mining, energy, water and defense clients, set up an ERP that runs each contract as a project. I specify how inspection and test plans, drawing revisions, DSGL export data, R&D Tax Incentive time records, progress claims and remote site work are handled, compare platforms neutrally and oversee implementation remotely.
Last reviewed by Vikas Saroj
I work remotely with Australian engineering businesses: mining equipment and services companies, structural and mechanical fabricators supplying resources and infrastructure projects, water and power equipment builders, defense industry suppliers and engineering consultancies working with tier one contractors.
Contracts here are often won against detailed technical specifications, delivered under inspection and test plans with hold points, and finished on a remote site with a fly-in fly-out crew. Large clients expect tight document control and clear progress claims, and defense work brings export and security obligations of its own.
Many of these firms have stretched MYOB or Xero with job costing add-ons, spreadsheets and a document management tool. I help you work out what an engineer-to-order ERP needs to do in your business, select a platform on merit, and make sure the implementer configures it for real contracts, not a demo company.
I concentrate on the contract, quality and compliance records that set Australian engineering work apart, and on making sure job cost reflects what really happens on site.
Inspection and test plans built into work orders, so hold points block progress until released, witness points are scheduled with the client and every record lands in the job's handover file.
Fields for DSGL assessments, permit numbers and end-user details on items, drawings and orders, with holds on shipments and technical data transfers until your export controls lead approves.
Timesheet tasks and change records that capture experimental development work as it happens, giving your R&D tax advisor organized evidence instead of reconstructed estimates.
Progress claims, retentions and variations set up per contract, with claim periods, supporting quantities and payment schedules tracked so cash and job cost can be compared every month.
Site phases that capture flights, accommodation, allowances, hire equipment and standby time for FIFO crews against the contract, giving the project manager a live view of site spend well before close-out.
A demo script based on a completed contract, including a revised drawing after long-lead ordering and a held inspection point, used to compare vendors on equal terms.
An ERP for engineering should make these numbers available without a spreadsheet. I design the data model and reports around them from the start.
Walk a finished contract through
Requirements and fair comparison
Implementation with independent oversight
A typical Australian engineering contract starts with a tender package from a mining company, utility, government agency or tier one contractor. You price design, procurement, fabrication, surface treatment, testing, freight and site work, often against tight technical specifications and the client's own standards. On award, the work is governed by a schedule, a set of deliverables and an inspection and test plan that the client must approve before fabrication begins.
Distance shapes the rest. Long-lead items may come from Europe, the United States or Asia, while the site may be in the Pilbara, the Bowen Basin or a regional water treatment plant. Freight is planned in modules, and installation is done by a crew on a fly-in fly-out roster, with flights, camp accommodation and allowances that rarely show up in the original estimate correctly.
The common symptoms when systems lag behind:
I trace one completed contract through every team in a process mapping exercise before discussing software.
Australian engineering firms supplying defense, aerospace or certain dual-use technologies may need permits to export goods or to supply technology listed on the Defence and Strategic Goods List, and the controls can extend to intangible transfers such as emailing drawings overseas or giving foreign staff access to controlled data. Defense clients may also expect you to meet security requirements through Defence's industry security program. Assessments and permits belong to your export controls lead and advisors; I do not interpret the list.
The ERP still has to reflect those decisions in daily work. I usually specify:
Few platforms do all of this out of the box. Some need configuration, some an add-on, some a connected document control system. That trade-off becomes visible in the gap analysis, which is where I want it rather than discovered after go-live.
Engineering firms that develop new equipment or methods often consider the R&D Tax Incentive. The program expects records of the activities you claim, ideally created as the work happens rather than assembled at year-end. Eligibility and registration are decisions for your R&D tax advisor, but the ERP can make their job far easier.
I structure it around normal engineering work so it does not feel like extra admin:
Change control also protects margin. A drawing revised after steel has been ordered or a weldment fabricated needs to flag affected purchase orders and work orders, and someone has to decide whether the client pays through a variation. I define the CAD or PLM to ERP release point, the revision rules and the variation decision in the solution design, which the implementer then works from.
Australian engineering contracts are usually paid through monthly progress claims, with retentions released in stages as the work is handed over and the defects period runs out. Where your scope involves construction work, state and territory security of payment legislation can apply, setting rules around payment claims, payment schedules and timeframes. Because each jurisdiction runs its own scheme, take legal or accounting advice on what applies to your contracts.
Inside the ERP, that translates into specific requirements:
Larger public and resources projects may also ask suppliers to show Australian industry participation, for example through local content or industry participation plans. That draws on supplier classifications and spend reports by project, which are easier to produce if suppliers are classified at setup. These requirements feed into requirements gathering alongside the operational ones.
The common starting point is MYOB or Xero with a job management add-on, a fabrication spreadsheet and a document tool for ITPs and certificates. That works until contracts get larger, defense work begins or a second workshop opens. At that point job cost, claims and quality records drift apart.
Migration is built around live contracts: contract sum and approved variations, the current budget, open purchase commitments, cost incurred, claims made, retention held and work remaining. Closed contracts stay archived. Item masters and drawing references are cleaned before load so revisions are not duplicated.
If your work is mainly repeat production, my Australian manufacturing ERP page fits better, and the engineering ERP guide explains the engineer-to-order model in general terms. Engagements run remotely, with workshops arranged around eastern, central and western time zones, and with recordings for site supervisors who cannot attend live. My ERP consulting work in Australia and the Australia hub explain how projects are scoped.
Tell me about your business and current systems. I’ll suggest the most sensible first step.
Book a Consultation
Not sure which ERP you need?
Share your business requirements with me and I will help you understand the right process, architecture and platform before implementation.
Yes, if the inspection steps are modeled on the work order or project task. A hold point becomes a step that must be released, with the release record attached, before the next operation or shipment proceeds. I test this with an ITP from a past contract, because platforms differ in how cleanly they handle it.
Store the assessment outcome and any permit against items and drawings, capture end-user details on orders, and hold shipments or drawing transfers until your export controls lead approves. Access rules should protect controlled data. The ERP records and enforces decisions; it does not make them.
Give each contract a site phase with cost categories for flights, accommodation, allowances, hire and standby, and have crews record time and expenses against it during the job. Weekly review of that phase shows overruns early, while variations can still be raised with the client.
Sometimes extending works, particularly for smaller firms with little fabrication. I compare the cost and risk of stretching the current setup with a move to an ERP, based on your contract mix and growth plans, and recommend whichever is more sensible. Independent advice means either answer is possible.
Every business is different. Share where you are today and what you want to fix, and I’ll tell you honestly whether and how I can help.
Book a Consultation
Book a consultation to talk through your processes, systems and goals. I’ll reply with practical next steps - no obligation.