Contact Info
Why do Sydney groups bring in an ERP business analyst?
An ERP business analyst converts day-to-day practice into written, testable requirements before anything is configured. For a Sydney group that usually means reconciling how the city head office and the western Sydney sites describe the same process, recording New South Wales obligations that the system must support, and setting approval rules across entities. I run these sessions remotely and deliver a structured BRD.
Last reviewed by Vikas Saroj
A typical Sydney business is rarely in one place. Leadership and finance may sit in the CBD, North Sydney or Parramatta, sales in Macquarie Park or Norwest, and warehouses, workshops or production lines in the industrial estates out west and south-west. Each location has its own way of doing the same job, and each will tell you its way is the standard.
My role as an ERP business analyst is to capture all of those versions, find where they genuinely need to differ and where they simply drifted apart, then write requirements a vendor can be held to. Workshops run remotely by video, site by site, and a visit can be arranged when a walk through the floor would settle a question faster.
These deliverables reflect how Sydney businesses are spread across the metro area and the state-level rules they operate under.
Separate online sessions with each location, from head office finance to the warehouse floor, so every team describes its own process in its own words before anyone compares them.
A list of every place where sites handle a process differently, with a decision recorded for each: standardize, keep as an approved variant, or retire the local workaround.
New South Wales rules that touch the system, such as payroll tax grouping data, long service leave records or construction payment claims, written as requirements for your advisors to confirm.
A delegation of authority matrix showing who approves purchases, credits, write-offs and price changes at each site and entity, ready to be built as workflow rules.
Swimlane diagrams in plain English with short labels, written so supervisors and staff whose first language is not English can review them and point out errors.
A business requirements document organized by process and site, each requirement numbered and prioritized so vendors can respond line by line and testers can trace it later.
Business first, technology second. You can hire me for one step - a BRD, a gap analysis, a vendor shortlist - or for the whole journey.
Hear every site separately
Decide one way of working
Write requirements vendors can answer
Greater Sydney is large and spread out, and many businesses grow by adding a site wherever space and labor are available. The result is headquarters in or near the city, a branch in Parramatta or the Hills District, and operational sites in places such as Wetherill Park, Smithfield, Eastern Creek or Moorebank. Each location develops its own habits: a different way of receiving goods, raising credits, approving overtime or recording returns.
When an ERP project starts, head office often describes the process as it was designed years ago. The sites describe what actually happens. If requirements are written only from the head office view, the new system will be configured for a process nobody follows, and users at the sites will rebuild their spreadsheets within weeks.
I avoid this by running separate remote workshops with each location before any combined session. Each team walks through its own documents and screens, and I record the steps, the exceptions and the workarounds. Only then do I bring process owners together to compare versions. The aim is not to force one site's way on everyone but to make a deliberate choice for every difference. The wider picture of Sydney's industries is on my Sydney ERP consultant page.
Several obligations that affect an ERP are set at state level, and a Sydney business works under New South Wales rules for them. Payroll tax is one example: whether related businesses are grouped, and how wages are split across entities, affects what data the payroll and finance systems must hold. Long service leave is another, because entitlements follow state legislation and the system needs accurate service history to support them. Builders and subcontractors face state security of payment rules that shape how payment claims and responses are issued and tracked.
I do not interpret these rules for you. That stays with your accountant, payroll provider or legal advisor. What I do is make sure the questions are asked early and the answers become requirements: which fields must be captured, which reports must exist, which deadlines need reminders and which system owns each record. Without that step, these needs tend to surface during testing, when they are expensive to add.
Each item goes into an obligations list with an owner, the advisor who confirmed it and the requirement it produced. Country-wide matters such as GST and Single Touch Payroll are handled on the Australia ERP business analyst page.
Sydney is home to many group head offices, and with that comes layered authority. A purchase that a site manager can approve alone in one entity may need finance sign-off in another. Credit notes, stock write-offs, price overrides and supplier changes often have informal rules that live in someone's memory or an old email. When the ERP arrives, those rules have to become explicit workflow, or approvals either block every transaction or wave everything through.
I capture this as a delegation of authority matrix: each transaction type, the value bands or conditions that change the approver, the role at each site or entity, and what happens when that person is away. I check it against how approvals actually happen today, which often reveals that some limits are routinely bypassed because they no longer fit the business.
The matrix then feeds requirements for approval workflow, audit trails and reporting on overrides. It also gives auditors and the board a clear statement of control. Where a group runs shared finance from Sydney for entities elsewhere, I add recharge and intercompany approval rules. My approval workflow approach covers how these rules are tested before go-live.
Sydney's workforce is linguistically diverse, especially in warehousing, manufacturing, cleaning, food production and aged care across western and south-western Sydney. Many supervisors and floor staff speak a language other than English at home. That has practical consequences for an ERP project that requirement documents often ignore.
First, process reviews must be accessible. If only managers can read the process maps, errors on the floor go unnoticed until go-live. I keep maps visual, labels short and language plain, so staff can point to a step and say it is wrong. Second, requirements should state which screens, labels, pick lists and instructions need to be available in other languages or rely on icons and barcodes instead of text. Third, training needs must be recorded as requirements, not left as an afterthought.
The engagement runs in English. Any translated text, training material or local-language labels are written or checked by bilingual people on your team or by a partner you appoint. My job is to make sure the requirement exists, has an owner and is tested with the people who will use it. Good process mapping is the starting point.
At the end of the analysis you receive a pack that vendors, partners and your own team can work from. The core is a business requirements document organized by process area, with every requirement numbered, prioritized as essential, important or optional, and linked to the site or entity it applies to. Process maps sit alongside it, together with the variant register recording what was standardized and what remains different by design.
The pack also includes the New South Wales obligations list with advisor confirmations, the delegation of authority matrix, a list of reports and dashboards each role needs, and an inventory of current systems and spreadsheets with a note of what each one does today. Sample documents, such as delivery dockets, invoices, payment claims or timesheets, are attached so vendors can see real formats.
Because each requirement is traceable, the same pack later drives the fit-gap review and the test scripts, so nothing agreed in a Sydney workshop is lost between selection and go-live. If you already have a draft, I can review it instead. For the full method, see ERP business analysis, or get in touch to discuss your sites and timing.
Tell me about your business and current systems. I’ll suggest the most sensible first step.
Book a Consultation
Not sure which ERP you need?
Share your business requirements with me and I will help you understand the right process, architecture and platform before implementation.
No. Some differences exist for good reasons, such as a site that handles bulky goods or a branch serving trade customers only. The aim is to make a conscious decision for each difference. I record every variant, show the cost of keeping it in the new system and let process owners choose.
No, that is a question for your accountant or tax advisor. My role is to make sure the question is asked early, then record what data, reports and system ownership the answer requires, so the ERP and payroll setup support it rather than discovering the need during testing.
We schedule short sessions at a quiet point in the shift, with a supervisor using a laptop or tablet on the floor. Staff show real documents and screens on camera. Where a walkthrough of the site would answer questions faster, a visit can be arranged in advance.
A vendor-written BRD usually describes the vendor's solution rather than your requirements. I review it against how your sites actually work, mark gaps and assumptions, and rewrite or extend it so it can be used to compare other vendors fairly and to test whatever system you choose.
Every business is different. Share where you are today and what you want to fix, and I’ll tell you honestly whether and how I can help.
Book a Consultation
Book a consultation to talk through your processes, systems and goals. I’ll reply with practical next steps - no obligation.